Massachusetts

I have no idea about either candidate's qualifications or merits in general but this article is one helluva scary thing to read and if this is how Martha Coackley thinks and functions, she would not seem to be a good choice. It's really astonishing to me how often simple logic and reason fail to bring people up short in such intense and important situations. I mean, is there real and reliable evidence? If so, why not use it instead of hyperbolic and outrageous statements? Abusers should not be allowed to see the light of day, no one quarrels with that, but what is to be gained by both building and jumping upon a bandwagon?