Wednesday, December 30, 2009
Browser display
posted at 3:15 PM | Permalink | 0 comment(s)
I've said this before and I'll say it again. It's weird how differently browsers pages on different computers, let alone how differently different browsers display (that sentence sure is hard to pace properly). Right now I'm on an Asus Eee PC and using IE8. I use IE8 on both my home desktop and at work and *they* pretty much look the same - but here the posts' text is was in Arial Black and a smaller font. Not pretty and not especially readable, either. Well, I'll fix I fixed it here and we'll see what happens on the other PCs as a result. Adventures in browser displays, right?! I guess this is why web developers and designers make the great big bucks....

Labels: ,

Friday, October 30, 2009
Is it just me?
posted at 1:34 PM | Permalink | 0 comment(s)
Or do other people's I.E.s sometimes just stop doing anything? It's the strangest thing and it didn't used to happen. No, detective, I cannot identify when it started but it's been going on a while now and it happens both at work where I'm on a great big huge network and at home where it's just me tapping into a cable system. Sometimes I click on a link and nothing happens. Nothing. No error message, no blue-screen-of-death, no misdirection, no weird things. Just plain nothing. I've tried stopping the "connecting" swirl (hasn't worked) and restarting the whole computer (hasn't worked) and turning everything off and back on (hasn't worked). Sometimes Firefox works when I.E. doesn't but it happens in Firefox, too, just less frequently. It isn't one or two sites, either, it's anything.

Labels: ,

Saturday, September 26, 2009
Computer trouble
posted at 11:50 PM | Permalink | 0 comment(s)
The recent silence from me was neither because I had nothing to say that I thought merited posting nor that I was running scared from commenters - reasons that have previously muffled my singular and oh-so-marvelous voice (ha ha ha). It was "technical difficulties" with my DSL. The issues started Wednesday evening. I called Verizon's supposedly 24/7 technical hotline and spent nearly three hours on the phone, 45 minutes just getting to a live human being and the rest of the time - unsuccessfully - just talking. The tech people a zillion miles away over oceans and seas, and very hard to hear clearly. Plus they seem programmed to say platitudes in response to almost everything (e.g., "that must be very frustating for you" and "I will definitely help you with that" etc.). The talking was time-delayed a bit and the sound quality was dreadful which doesn't give you much confidence since Verizon was first and foremost a PHONE company. I mean, inter-country phone quality was awful when I was in college but that was in the Dark Ages; I would have assumed the cables and/or copper or whatever it is now are far better materials.

I realized at some point that I had unconnected a phone while rearranging furniture on Wednesday, a phone I no longer use, so I thought maybe unplugging the phone had signalled to the modem that something had changed, so I replugged the phone. The modem still wasn't working on Thursday night when I got home, however, so I called the supposedly direct number that one of the tech people had given me. What a surprise (not) to find that it wasn't a direct line at all but just another entré to regular lines with lots and lots of prompts to choose one's way through. As a result, I got to spend another 2-3 hours with all the techies saying they'd tested the connections and everything tested fine so, oh my, it is very hard to know what's wrong and my goodness how frustrating it must be for me. No one could figure out what was wrong except one person I caught who said she'd been out the previous times I called but she could see that the phone line was unresponsive. Eventually the phone got fixed, on Friday, and they told me the DSL line tested fine. However, when I got home Friday night around midnight, the phone was indeed fine but the DSL was still blinking (a/k/a no signal). Saturday morning I called again and spent 4 more hours at it. With no success. (I definitely need to learn to quit sooner.)

So here's the thing. I completely understand that things break and that maybe whatever happened to the phone caused a problem in the modem or even the router. Or maybe vice versa. But it should never have taken four hours for people who know these things to figure out that the first issue was the phone line. Furthermore, a customer should not have to repeat anything dozens of times and STILL be ignored. I wish I was exaggerating about that, but I'm not.

They said they have to come to the house to diagnose and fix the problem, but can't come on Saturdays. Well, that's what they said until I said for something around the two hundredth time (NOT an exaggeration) that I could not be home during the week. Could. Not. Be. Home. During. The. Week. Because it would require taking an entire day off because they won't provide a two-hour window. After all that, I said I guessed the only answer was that I would stop Verizon service and write the PSC about the whole experience just trying to get a DSL up and running. At that point, somehow, magically, the guy said "let me check something" and it seems they CAN send someone on Saturday. Next week.

However, it was THE most unpleasant seven or eight hours. I am not kidding that I said "I can't be home on a weekday but only on weekends" and the man answered with "Well, we will send someone Tuesday, all right?" And that exchange happened dozens of times and even after I was referred to a supervisor and then to his supervisor. No wonder we make jokes about how they are trained to ignore what a person says. They are, in the end, simply beyond infuriating and frustrating and rude. On a scale I have never previously encountered.

I had work I had to do on Saturday evening so the solution I came up with was to try one thing first (buying a (returnable) modem and seeing if it worked because it was the modem that was faulty). Apparently that was not the answer. (I am pretty convinced by now that it's the signal being sent incorrectly but I may never know.) The second thing I did was pick up a NetZero HiSpeed internet connection disc. It isn't particularly high speed, not when you're accustomed to DSL, but it *IS* an internet connection so I was able to do my work. I am grateful.

I've talked to several people about all this and they ALL told me about their or their friends' similar Verizon horror stories, two of which were identical about being on hold forEVER and utterly unable to hear or understand the tech people and having to wait a week to get it fixed. They have ALL switched to cable or Optimum. So if my sample is representative of anything, Verizon had better be worried. I mean, no one had no problems. That's quite startling. Even with a small sample of about a dozen people, 100% is amazing. Do the words AIG and Lehman resonate with their priorities? Don't they realize what we all now know, that huge no longer means invulnerable?

Labels: , ,

Thursday, August 27, 2009
Fonts
posted at 9:20 AM | Permalink | 2 comment(s)
What do you think about san serif versus serif fonts for blog posts? I like being able to distinguish post text and quotations and titles, etc. from each other at a quick glance but is serif just too annoying and/or old-fashioned??

Labels: ,

Tuesday, August 25, 2009
Layout
posted at 6:54 PM | Permalink | 0 comment(s)
Apologies for yet another iteration of this page. Some rare readers and I quite liked the see-through-to-Paris layout but some computers with different graphics capabilities displayed text and background with too closely-similar values. Perhaps as a result, larger graphics and headings had fuzzy edges and some text was fuzzy. Heaven forfend that every precious word emanating from my fingers not be completely legible so I fiddled and now all seems well. Although it is now perhaps a bit less exciting and interesting, it has the merit of being legible. Merit, that is, if one actually wants it read.

Labels: ,

Word Press - what?
posted at 8:50 AM | Permalink | 8 comment(s)
I was casually considering moving to Word Press for a slew of fairly unimportant reasons so I started meandering through their front page info. It all looked kind of nice and clean. Almost had me hooked. Until three things. One, you have to download their software which means you can only modify the design - if you are so inclined to poke around their code which I gather isn't all that easy anyway - from your home PC and where's the fun in that. Also, you have to pay nearly $30 a year in order to be allowed to poke around in the code. Seems kind of weird. That almost sent me packing. Then I read that sometimes they may insert ads on your blog, not asking first or anything, just doing it. EXCUSE ME??? Here's the exact text: "Advertising: To support the service we may occasionally show Google text ads on your blog, however we do this very rarely." And, guess effing what? If you don't like that, you can PAY for the privilege of NOT having any ads ever "for a low yearly fee" of another thirty-ish dollars. Reminds me of how you have to pay for manual gear shifts instead of automatic - even though cars are inherently standard and it takes more work to make them automatic. Who decides what "should be" so much the norm that the other choice should be charged for? Anyway, what the heck is up with that? Charging fees for NOT having ads and NOT locking down the code?

Labels: ,

Saturday, July 11, 2009
ImageShack hacking
posted at 1:21 AM | Permalink | 0 comment(s)
Grrrr.  How utterly annoying.  I really do not understand why scurrilous individuals with misleadingly innocuous names like spammers and hackers exist.  Seriously.  Like terrorists, these people obviously get off on knowing they're startling and maybe even scaring people.  They really need to get lives.  I mean, if they're so all-fired up and dying to intrude on everyone's life, and since they're demonstrably clever and creative, why the heck don't they put their intelligence and energy to good use like, oh I don't know, solving the mysteries of the universe or at least eliminating hunger and war.

Anyway, if you're still being held hostage, this post won't help and you are still seeing a great big black message from "the anti-sec movement." And if you were, you've already solved it if you're reading this. For me, after rebooting and clearing all kinds of caches, to no avail, I spent a (perhaps dangerous) moment reading the apparently harmless message in the big back blob.  Then I went to Bing and was grateful for its accurate short list results and mouse-hovering summary trick because I quickly found out that the problem was an ImageShack hack and that one needed to remove whatever was hosted by them.  Puzzled because I did not knowingly know what ImageShack was, I went to the Blogger forum in Google Groups' - a resource that's answered questions and rescued me several times - whence I learned that I should copy my template into WordPad, find the offending image, and delete it.  Indeed there was an up-arrow image there hosted by them although I don't think I ever used an up-arrow.  I deleted it, saved the template back into blogger and, voila!  Since all my other images are hosted by PhotoBucket, it seems unlikely that I would have one random image hosted by someone else, especially an image I don't use.  Plus, these brilliant idiots (that is not an oxymoron) clearly could have hack-dropped an image along with the black blob, right?  Who knows.  Anyway, the nasty business is over, it seems, and I hope very few or maybe no rare readers got snagged by these ridiculous people.

While I was at it, I downloaded Opera.  I remember liking its interface years ago although I found the features limited at the time, but that was when it was a new and somewhat outsider kid on the browser block.  Now it has serious fans and tons of interesting and slick features and choices.  It has a reputation as much less hackable, too.  We shall see.

Labels: ,